It is a stretch, I know, to find the thread between Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Donald J Trump but I’d like to give it a go. Arguably, Doyle’s invention of Sherlock Holmes and Donald’s invention of himself are both characters on the spectrum. One is a benign obsessive compulsive sleuth and the other a malignant sociopath.
Sherlock Holmes was a fit for the late Victorian age. Trump is less of a man than a scourge who sensed a vacuum created by an age of dislocation and festering grievance. The
sleuth with the deerstalker hat was a noble outlier; the Donald is a
megalomaniac who offers a satchel full of fibs and empty promises.
Penny Dreadfuls were read by an estimated one million
Londoners each week. They were illustrated sensationalist rags with stories of
cheap thrills, piracy, murders and science fiction, aimed at young men. They
ripped off versions of Wilkie Collins, Bram Stoker, Dickens and Doyle.
Holmes’ exploits were fodder just as Trump and the National
Enquirer used each other to fabricate his exploits while vilifying his enemies.
For eight years they had Barack and Michelle divorcing with as much credibility
as a JFK citing or alien landing. The Dreadfuls were the social media, the Tic-Toks
and Tweets of the day. Both were the creation of fevered minds. At least the 19th century
version presented itself as fiction while Donald seems unable to distinguish
fact from fable.
The British Empire was at its peak. Think
globalization. Big bucks were being made by a few people. The air was foul.
Science seemed out of control with epochal technology.
The bucolic countryside was fast disappearing with a growing divide between
rural and urban consciousness. There were 200,000 prostitutes in London.
Homelessness, filth and indenture coexisted alongside a genteel civility.
People knew their place. Social mobility was virtually unknown. Rigidity and
rectitude were giving way to randomness and relativity. Society was held
together by a veneer of respectability, class fixity along with a sense of
order and resolve. Every disruption had its resolution.
Enter Sherlock Holmes. He brought rationality and logic. He
deduced. He rooted evil out and restored civility. He was their defense against
a random universe. He never died because he never lived. Arthur Conan Doyle’s
invention rested on the shoulders of Edgar Allen Poe’s inventions and upon
Sherlock’s shoulder came Agatha Christie’s Miss Marple and Hercule Poirot,
Raymond Chandler’s Phillip Marlowe and Dashiell Hammett’s Sam Spade…the genre is
still digging. Detectives detect. They mostly act on their own as
benevolent vigilantes offering the illusion of justice.
The new sheriff with the technicolor hair who rode into
America’s heartland, on the last train from Yuma, is Donald Trump, that old
robber-baron, land-grabber, in disguise. He and he alone nails the most-wanted
posters to the wall. He leads the posse, locates the hanging tree and prepares
the noose. He is the faux-detective offering simplistic words with a ten-year
old’s vocabulary to complex problems.
Yet both Doyle and Donald appear at pivotal moments, albeit
125 years apart. Brits also encountered immigrants from their jewel, India.
Holmes pandered to Londoner’s xenophobia with a distrust of foreigners. Many
Indians ended up in Newgate Prison on the barest suspicion. Gay behavior was
criminalized just as many red states would have it today. It would be decades
before women were fully enfranchised in England. Their first voting rights act
in 1918 was restricted to propertied women over thirty. 1895 Britain and red-state U.S. bear some resemblance in their racism and misogyny.
The name Sherlock suggests razor sharp certainty. I suppose
he would be repulsed by the fuzzy mind of Donald. The man from Baker Street
could surmise a man’s entire profile by a glance at his hands and the smell of
his tobacco. Our guy from the high tower smelled angst and fear and inflamed it
into irrational rage. There is a toxicity afoot surrounding Trump, something like
the yellow fog that fell on London Town back in the day. Moriarity is in our midst.
No comments:
Post a Comment