As the story goes….two
friends go to the racetrack. They are losing every race but notice that the
couple in front of them are winning big. One friend suggests the other follow
the couple, stay close behind and lay your money exactly where they put it. Ten
minutes later he returns with two hot dogs a beer and a coke.
That’s me, the guy on the
wrong line. I have a history of losing. If someone had followed me for the past
sixty years and done exactly the opposite as far as buying and selling real
estate, he’d be a very rich man today. It doesn’t get much better in politics.
At age fifteen in 1948 I
knew everything, in absolute terms. Armed with stacks of leaflets I scampered
from door to door, from floor to floor of apartment buildings, just ahead of
the superintendent. This was Truth I was putting under each door like some sort
of messianic zealot. I was convinced Henry Wallace and the Progressive Party
had it right. Of course, they didn’t win a single state.
I voted for Eugene McCarthy
rather Hubert Humphrey in 1968. Big mistake. In 1972 I was out there again ringing
doorbells for George McGovern. He carried Massachusetts and lost the other 49.
Never trust a political junkie.
We know too much which is to say we know nothing. My calculus is based on the
past which can be misleading in times of epochal change. Trump’s victory in 2016
and his takeover of the Republican Party signals an upheaval of the old two
party agendas.
I look at the constituencies
and see a greater number of moderates than either polarity suggests. The far
right makes noise. The Bernie left is equally passionate but they would seem
unelectable since their numbers are less than the sum of the 4-5 candidates in
the center. I see no sign yet of any of them dropping out. Perhaps each is
counting on a brokered convention determined by establishment Democrats. In the
meantime Putin and Trump relish a Bernie Sanders candidacy just as I recall
salivating over a Trump nomination. My most recent blunder.
Maybe I’ve got it all
wrong….again. Could it be that the Democratic Socialist will draw from that
vast pool of disaffected voters who normally sit it out? Maybe it takes a rabid
anti-Trump Populist to defeat the pseudo-Populist, Trump; not a reasonable,
dispassionate Centrist but a firebrand, unashamed Socialist with a clear, hard-driving
narrative and enough savvy to make space for the Never-Trumpers, traditional
Democrats and Independents.
I still believe the overwhelming imperative is to oust Trump before he eviscerates our government with incompetent toadys, pardons everyone from John Wilkes Booth to Bernie Madoff and puts the planet at risk with his monarchical impulses.
The prospect of a Bernie Sanders candidacy must be regarded seriously as our consensus nominee. The very idea goes beyond my vision and therefore might be another instance of the new landscape which escapes my historical grasp.
I still believe the overwhelming imperative is to oust Trump before he eviscerates our government with incompetent toadys, pardons everyone from John Wilkes Booth to Bernie Madoff and puts the planet at risk with his monarchical impulses.
The prospect of a Bernie Sanders candidacy must be regarded seriously as our consensus nominee. The very idea goes beyond my vision and therefore might be another instance of the new landscape which escapes my historical grasp.
If Sanders goes into the
July convention with a ten point spread over his nearest rival but less than a
majority, I believe the Party will crown him the winner by acclamation. To do
otherwise would be political suicide. I’m girding my loins for such an outcome.
Maybe this time around Bernie can make the association between Socialism and
Social Tea Biscuits and he’ll ride his horse into the Oval Office.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete